Which of the following can be considered a reason for quick project delivery?

The option regarding shorter time-to-impact is a valid reason for quick project delivery because it emphasizes the importance of delivering tangible results quickly within a project. By focusing on achieving outcomes that matter to stakeholders in a reduced timeframe, teams can implement features or improvements that provide immediate value. This approach not only satisfies stakeholders but also allows for iterative enhancements based on feedback, thus fostering agility in the project lifecycle.

In contrast, while a reduced project scope can sometimes lead to quicker delivery, it may compromise the project's overall goals and quality, depending on how significant the omitted features are. Higher funding requirements typically indicate more complexity and resources, which can actually extend the project timeline rather than expedite it. Complex stakeholder negotiations can slow down decision-making processes, resulting in delays that hinder quick project delivery.